Survey on Cell Phone Usage Patterns Among Students at Gomal University

Authors

  • Rubab BS (Sports Sciences and Physical Education), Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan
  • Dr. Syed Asif Abbas HoD, Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan
  • Amer Latif Assistant Professor, Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Naseem Ullah Ph.D Scholar, Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Abstract

Main Purpose: This study investigates mobile phone usage patterns, their perceived academic impacts, and management preferences among university students in Pakistan. Method: A cross-sectional survey of 40 students was conducted, employing quantitative analysis of usage frequency, behavioral patterns, and self-reported academic outcomes. Findings: All participants owned smartphones, with 72.5% using them daily for social media (62.5%), communication (37.5%), and educational tasks. While 60% acknowledged phones as learning distractions, 65% reported positive academic impacts via EdTech tools (55%). Anxiety without phones was prevalent (82.5%), and peer distraction was frequently observed (90%). Students preferred time limits (45%) and usage zones (42.5%) for management. Conclusion: Mobile phones serve dual roles as academic aids and disruptors, necessitating balanced policies to harness benefits while mitigating distractions. Implications: Institutions should integrate structured guidelines (e.g., time restrictions), promote digital literacy, and leverage EdTech mindfully to optimize educational outcomes.

Keywords: Mobile phone usage, academic performance, university students, digital dependency, policy recommendations.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-14

How to Cite

Rubab, Dr. Syed Asif Abbas, Amer Latif, & Naseem Ullah. (2024). Survey on Cell Phone Usage Patterns Among Students at Gomal University. Policy Journal of Social Science Review, 2(5), 20–35. Retrieved from https://policyjssr.com/index.php/PJSSR/article/view/310